my new bike(s)

User avatar
truslack
Posts: 623
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 11:29 pm
Location: Preston, Lancs

Re: my new bike(s)

Post by truslack » Fri Apr 27, 2012 11:53 am

Wahey! Armstrongs going for the right price not people expecting 1000quid for em! My faith in humanity has been restored a little bit.
0 x
1981 Suzuki GSX250E - Commuter
1986 Armstrong MT500 - Work horse - Needs engine rebuild
1987 Armstrong MT500 - Sidecar bike
1987 Suzuki RG125 - Project
1988 MZ ETZ 300

stuvy

Re: my new bike(s)

Post by stuvy » Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:47 pm

truslack wrote:Wahey! Armstrongs going for the right price not people expecting 1000quid for em! My faith in humanity has been restored a little bit.
Why do MT500's gor for less than MT350's?


Sapper, the Series truck was over priced at Ă‚ÂŁ3500 for a vehicle needing work. He has decided to keep it now so im not too fused either way as I wanted a bike but my missus wanted me to get another 4x4
0 x

User avatar
Barrie
Posts: 533
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 12:22 pm
Location: Kelso, Scottish Borders
Location: Kelso, Scotland

Re: my new bike(s)

Post by Barrie » Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:36 pm

stuvy wrote:
truslack wrote:Wahey! Armstrongs going for the right price not people expecting 1000quid for em! My faith in humanity has been restored a little bit.
Why do MT500's gor for less than MT350's?
Because they are older, without electric start with worse brakes and they are British :D

However they are fantastic fun, able to put an electric start in, and you can upgrade the brakes. Win win win. They also look better IMO
0 x
MT500 "Le Shuttle" In memory of Jim Burns
Jawa CZ 125
Need help uploading photos onto the forum?
click here

m1ks

Re: my new bike(s)

Post by m1ks » Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:37 pm

Because people are scared of spraining their dainty little ankles and prefer to press a button.
:D
The 500 is a much more appropriate engine for modern roads and traffic too.
0 x

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 134 guests